How To Get Faster On Lsat

logical reasoning speed

How to go faster on LSAT logical reasoning

Four Role Series: How to go faster
ane. How to go faster on the LSAT
2. How to go faster on Logical Reasoning [This Article]
3. How to become faster on Reading Comprehension
four. How to go faster on Logic Games

How exercise I go faster at logical reasoning? I know the textile, but when I accept timed sections, things fall apart. – Sarah, LSAT Educatee

Every bit I wrote in the main speed FAQ, information technology's a myth that yous can know the textile but have trouble with timing. The better you know the material, the faster yous'll go. So know that lxxx-ninety% of speed bug on LR are solved past getting better at LR, non by separately getting ameliorate at "speed".

However, there are some things you tin work on to railroad train speed specifically. Note that a lot of these things actually fall into the "getting better at LR" category. The tactics below are the way experts approach LR. Or how I approach information technology anyway. Simply these tactics also happen to have an touch on on speed.

1. Understand the stimulus before you look at the answers

The stimulus is the big block of text on each LR question. It'due southpast farthe most important role of the questions. The answer choices are traps. lxxx% of them are wrong, and 100% of them are designed to confuse you. LR answer choices subtract information.

But everyone'south in a blitz to get to the answers. This slows you down. Yous probably don't realize how much time you lot're wasting on the answer choices. It's easy to let lx-seventy seconds slip by as your eyes sprint from answer to reply.

If you know the stimulus 100%, the answers are like shooting fish in a barrel. I guarantee this is true. I unremarkably don't spend more than 5-xv seconds on the respond choices. Just that's considering I put a lot of work intocompletelyunderstanding what'south going on in the stimulus. I'll read it ii-3 times if I need to. This takes far less time than you realize. It might take you xxx seconds to read a stimulus the outset time, but only five more than to read it once more. Accept a friend time you on stimulus vs. answers, you lot'll be amazed.

What do I mean past "consummate understanding?". On an statement, at a minimum, you lot should empathize precisely what the decision and reasoning say. This is harder than it seems. It's very common for LSAT students to say "I understand this" when actually they've missed a key point or understood the conclusion too broadly.

Y'all can bank check how you're doing by looking at my LSAT explanations. I identify the precise conclusion and reasoning of every LR argument. If you are moving on to the answers without having identified everything I identify in the explanations, then you lot're slowing yourself downwards.

ii. Prephrase the correct answer

Prephrasing means predicting what the answer will be. Almost 100% of LR questions tin be prephrased. I noticed this when writing explanations. I write my analysis sectionsbeforeI expect at the answer choices, and I usually don't have to edit what I wrote. I already know what I'm looking for.

If I can do this, and then so can you. I don't have access to any underground information. I'm looking at the same stimulus y'all are. How am I prephrasing?

I precisely place the conclusion and reasoning, as I wrote above.
I usually read or skim the statement again, if annihilation is unclear or if I've forgotten part of it.
This pace is the most of import role. I terminate and recollect about why the argument could be incorrect. I don't expect at the answers until I exercise this.

Training logical reasoning prephrasing

You can train yourself to get better at prephrasing. Do some LR questions untimed, and cover up the answers. Only look at the stimulus. Call back about information technology securely. Write down what you expect the reply to be. Once y'all have a possible reply, and then you can uncover the answers to check if yous're right.

Keep doing this exercise. If your prephrases aren't matching, then it means you lot need to modify how y'all think about prephrases. When the right respond is different, await back at the stimulus and see how you lot could accept predicted the answer from the data in the argument.

I should notation that it'southward a bad idea to become hung upward on a specific prephrase. Oftentimes, at that place are multiple flaws in an argument, or multiple ways to depict a flaw. You might think of a specific prephrase, but then information technology doesn't friction match the answers. This happens to me also. When it happens, I only forget about my prephrase and consider the answers based on what I know from the stimulus.

So a prephrase is a nice thing when it works, but you lot should discard prephrases rapidly when they don't piece of work.

3. Read all the answers before yous consider whatever thoroughly

forty% of the time, the right respond will be D or East. And often, the respond will exist obviously right one time you look at it.

It is therefore a error to spend 30 seconds thinking about A or B if you haven't even looked at D and E yet. I personally become quickly throughallthe answers before I advisedly consider whatever of them.

When I look at the answers, I usually either take a prephrase, or a clear idea of what would brand an reply right or wrong. I do a quick laissez passer through the answers to sort them into categories. Here's how I arroyo the answers. I spend no more than than a couple 2nd categorizing each ane:

i. Clearly wrong —> eliminate
ii. Probably wrong. Proceed, but non a contender.
iii. Quite possibly correct. Examine more closely after commencement pass.
4. Virtually certainly right —> Mark every bit right, simply check rest to be certain.

Normally, my outset pass volition either result in iv, virtually certainly right, or I'll be left with 1-2 answers that are possibly right. So I check those answers more than carefully and look at the stimulus once more to be sure.

When I'm considering the answers more carefully, I don't really look at categories i and ii: certainly wrong and probably wrong. I'1000 enlightened that these answersmightbe right, merely why spend time in that location?

Annotation that you lot demand to go along track of how well you're categorizing answers. For instance, if you determine that an respond is "probably wrong", but then it's the right respond, you demand to figure outwhyy'all made that error. If you actively review how y'all classify answers, yous'll improve your classification skills.

Once get good at reply classification, you'll be able to skim through the five answers and sort them with ease. This significantly speeds you lot upward by preventing yous from wasting time on early on answers, and letting you lot find the correct answer immediately in cases where the reply is obvious once you spot it.

4. Place question types that slow you downwardly, and drill them

It's not enough to be right on LR. You lot want to be right and fast. If you lot tin get 100% of parallel reasoning questions right, but information technology takes yous 2:xxx minutes per question, then you lot tin can hardly boast of your parallel reasoning skills.

Certain question types are fourth dimension sinks. For example, parallel reasoning questions tend to be long. Certain principle questions are long too. Only,there are ways to do these questions faster. In one case you lot identify that a certain question type slows you down, drill information technology. And set up a high standard. Know that experts don't accept whatever longer to practise any one type of question compared to others; there's always a shortcut.

This FAQ isn't the place to requite tips on how to handle all question types. But ofttimes, but knowing that something is possible can allow you better. I tin can solve a long parallel reasoning question in 30 seconds. I have no undercover knowledge, I just know what to await for. Y'all tin larn to do this for each question blazon too, if y'all set a high standard and enquiry how people get those questions right, fast.

v. Train for speed (by doing timed sections)

Train for logical reasoning speed

How can you go faster if you lot don't train speed?

If you want to go faster, then you have to at least some practice under timed conditions. A lot of people inquire me why they can't go fast, merely then admit that virtually all of their practice is untimed. If y'all aren't training for speed, then you won't have any pressure to go faster.

Untimed work has its identify, just youneedto do timed practice as well. The LSAT is a timed test, and the but way to prepare for this is to practice under actual conditions. The more timed sections you do, the more you'll get into the rhythm of the examination's timing.

Yous can also modify the timing to train yourself. For example, suppose you demand 45 minutes to practice a section comfortably. Equally a do exercise, yous can practise a timed section with 42 minutes. This is fast plenty that it forces you lot to adapt to the timing, just not and so fast that you're overwhelmed. Then work your fashion downwards to 35.

You don't have to finish at that place. If you lot can stop in 35 minutes, then work on some sections where yous simply take 32-33 minutes. This is called overtraining. If you can succeed under harsh conditions, and so the test itself will be much less stressful.

Don't brand all of your timed practice overtraining or undertraining. But they're useful tools to use in social club to arrange yourself to timing. And definitely practice a lot of timed 35 minute sections. This is the best way to go used to timing.

vi. Monitor your free energy

High performers in any field are acutely aware of their mental country. You need to be too. Whatever difficult, proficient activity has its stresses. Novices get overwhelmed. High performers encounter issues just as they brainstorm, and tin take action to stay on track.

Here's a common scenario. You encounter a long parallel reasoning question. The mere sight of it produces a twinge of panic. This happens to me. The question is….what happens next?

Me: Oh, I experience panic. Why? I guess it's considering the question is long, and seems frightening. Simply that's empty-headed. I've washed questions similar this before. Time to breathe and then do the question.

You lot: Aah, it'southward long! What if I tin can't do it!??! Fuck, I wish I was better at this. I'll never go into law school at this charge per unit. I'm such a loser. What will Julie think of me? Mmm, Julie, she's and so pretty. Hmm, Julie, didn't she mention something nearly going to a concert this week. I like concerts. Or practise I? Maybe I just get to be with people. They're kind of loud. Only it's fun to see the bands. The rolling stones. They're pretty good. Is Mick Jagger still alive? I call up so, I"d have heard if he was expressionless. I'm kinda hungry. Maybe I'll get something to eat. Oh await, I can't eat, I'm taking the LSAT.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! I'm taking the LSAT. I simply spent who knows how long daydreaming. That was so stupid. Fuck, why am I and then stupid!!!?!!?!?!? I'k such a loser. What will Julie think of me? Mmm, Julie, she's then pretty. Fuck, no, I'thousand doing the LSAT! I can't recall nigh Julie at present. Focus. What question am I on? Oh, this parallel reasoning question. Aaaaah, information technology's long! What if I tin can't do it? Fuck, I wish I was better at this!!!!! I'll never go into police force schoolhouse at this rate. I'm a loser!!!!! Maybe I should have stayed in that band. Aww, who am I kidding, I'd never exist Mick Jagger. Man, if he even still alive. Fourth dimension passes so fast, and….oh fuck, in that location's only ten minutes left!!!!!! I'one thousand only on question 13. How did this happen!?!?!?!?

Sound familiar? That'south your listen on panic autopilot. The key to avoiding this is to detect thefirstmoment of panic or stress, and respond to information technology while it's still small-scale. Jiff. Relax. Information technology's ok to take a moment to gather your senses. The alternative is that wall of text above.

You're homo. Yous're distractible and prone to panic. It'southward how we're congenital. Yous need to recognize this, and to develop habits that let y'all manage stress and become the work done regardless. The first step is paying attending to how yous feel.

You tin can exercise this in everyday life. For instance, suppose someone's rude to yous. What practice you practice? Do y'all yell at them and escalate things? Do you spend the next hour in a bad mood? Neither is a sensible response. What do you lot care if someone was rude? Acquire to recognize the feeling of being annoyed from rudeness. Acknowledge it, and then remind yourself that'due south it's not a big deal. Respond to the situation the fashion yououghtto, after things consideration. Most things we become stressed about aren't worth stressing about, and aye, this includes doing a timed LSAT section.

If y'all tin can recognize when you feel stress/fear/sadness/panic/anger, then you can manage those emotions. This doesn't mean repressing them. Sometimes it makes sense to exist angry or to be afraid. But and then again, nosotros often get angry over really tiny things. If you tin can recognize the onset of emotion, then y'all tin besides know when it doesn't brand sense to respond emotionally to a situation.

If you train this ability, you'll be able to handle the LSAT much more than smoothly. When you feel the start of stress/fearfulness/sadness/panic/anger, admit the emotion. Have a few deep breaths. You're just taking a test. Yous're looking at a piece of paper with ink on it. It can't hurt you lot. Once you recover your focus, yous can solve the questionfaster.

This advice applies to all sections, but especially to logical reasoning. Logical reasoning questions aren't related to each other, so it's easier to have short breaks betwixt questions. I personally accept lots of small, five-10 second breaks while doing logical reasoning sections. This takes abitof time upward front, but I can get through the department a lot faster because I continue my free energy and focus throughout.

seven. Skip difficult logical reasoning questions (and come dorsum)

E'er review a section, look at a question you found hard, and say "Aaaah, it's obviously B! Why didn't I see that?"

This is very common. Once your brain forms a view of a situation, it's very difficult to change your mind. This is usually a expert thing. It lets you make sense of a chaotic world. But it's counterproductive on LSAT questions. If yous grade a incorrect view of a question, it's almost impossible to ready things.

Then don't try. Skip the question. Come back if you have time. Skipping questions has the following benefits:

Yous take more time for other questions. This is huge. You're giving upwards 1 point to get many more.
You might actually have time left over at the end of the section. Then you can come dorsum to the questions you skipped.

Having time left over at the end of the section changes everything. Get-go, you're no longer rushed as you practise the section. You know you can end. Second, you'll accept fourth dimension to doublecheck questions and to take a 2d look at questions you skipped. The only way y'all'll finish with extra time is if yous learn to skip hard questions. They're timesinks.

I routinely skip 3-iv questions per section. I marker off answers I'm considering, and come dorsum at the end. Unremarkably, when I await again I form a new view of the question and it becomes much easier. Time away from the question lets y'all see things you don't run into the starting time fourth dimension through.

So I skip questions, initially, merely I notwithstanding get them right. You have a choice:

You can spend 2:30 minutes thinking about a hard question, OR
You can spend a infinitesimal thinking about the question, then motility on. Y'all'll have 1:xxx to spend on other questions, and you can use 30 seconds of that time to take a 2nd look at the question later on you're done.

My vote'south for option Two. Your time will be far more efficient if y'all make it the habit of moving on from questions once yous notice yous're in a rut. Usually, if you haven't solved a question in 1:00-one:30 minutes, whatever additional time spent on it is pure waste product. Save that fourth dimension, finish the section and come dorsum. You'll accept much greater odds of success the 2nd time around.

Update:If you need more help on logical reasoning, I've created an advanced seminar on how to do better at them: https://lsathacks.com/product/lr-mastery-seminar/

More LSAT speed tips

Iv Function Serial: How to get faster
1. How to get faster on the LSAT
ii. How to become faster on Logical Reasoning [This Article]
3. How to go faster on Reading Comprehension
4. How to get faster on Logic Games

Podcast Episode: LSAT Pros ep. xi, LSAT Logical Reasoning Strategies

Video: How to go faster at LSAT logical reasoning

Howdy, I'yard

I run LSAT Hacks, and got a 177 on the LSAT. The single all-time thing I've e'er made is the set of LSAT Mastery seminars. They show you how to recall like a 170+ scorer when doing questions. Go them here: Mastery Seminars

I guarantee you lot'll like them, or y'all get your coin back within 7 days. There's no hazard. Cheque the reviews, people have said they improved within a few days.
---------
Photos and Updates: You can follow me on Instagram here

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.